The Chrome network team uses a two day bug triage rotation.  The main goals are
to identify and label new network bugs, and investigate network bugs when no
label seems suitable.

Responsibilities

To be done on each rotation.  These responsibilities should be tracked, and
anything left undone at the end of a rotation should be handed off to the next
triager.  The downside to passing along bug investigations like this is each new
triager has to get back up to speed on bugs the previous triager was
investigating.  The upside is that triagers don't get stuck investigating issues
after their time after their rotation, and it results in a uniform, predictable
two day commitment for all triagers.

Primary Responsibilities:
* Identify new crashers that are potentially network related.  You should check
    the most recent canary, the previous canary (if the most recent less than a
    day old), and any of dev/beta/stable that were released in the last couple
    of days, for each platform.  File Cr-Internals-Network bugs on the tracker
    when new crashers are found.
* Identify new network bugs, both on the bug tracker and on the crash server.
    All Unconfirmed issues filed during your triage rotation should be scanned,
    and, for suspected network bugs, a network label assigned.  A triager is
    responsible for looking at bugs reported from noon PST / 3:00 pm EST of the
    last day of the previous triager's rotation until the same time on the last
    day of his rotation.  
* Request data about recent unassigned Cr-Internals-Network bugs from reporters.
    "Recent" means issues updated in the past week or so.
* Investigate each recent (New comment within the past week or so)
    Cr-Internals-Network issue until you can do one of the following:
  * Mark it as WontFix (working as intended, obsolete issue) or a duplicate.
  * Mark it as a feature request.
  * Remove the Cr-Internals-Network label, replacing it with at least one more
    specific network label or non-network label.  Promptly adding non-network
    labels when appropriate is important to get new bugs in front of someone
    familiar with the relevant code, and to remove them from the next triager's
    radar.  Because of the way the bug report wizard works, a lot of bugs
    incorrectly end up with the network label.
  * The issue is assigned to an appropriate owner.
  * If there is no more specific label for a bug, it should be investigated
    until we have a good understanding of the cause of the problem, and some
    idea how it should be fixed, at which point its status should be set to
    Available.  Future triagers should ignore bugs with this status, unless
    investigating stale bugs.
* Monitor UMA histograms and gasper alerts.
    TODO (mmenke):  Add a suggested workflow.

Best Effort (As you time):
* Investigate unowned and owned but forgotten net/ crashers that are still
    occurring (As indicated by go/chromecrash), prioritizing frequent and long
    standing crashers.
* Investigate old bugs, prioritizing the most recent.
* Close obsolete bugs.

If you've investigated an issue (in code you don't normally work on) to an
extent that you know how to fix it, and the fix is simple, feel free to take
ownership of the issue and create a patch while on triage duty, but other tasks
should take priority.

See bug-triage-suggested-workflow.txt for suggested workflows.
See bug-triage-labels.txt for labeling tips for network and non-network bugs.