| **TODO(vtl)**: Reorganize this to be properly structured. |
| |
| # Mojom IDL |
| |
| The Mojom IDL (interface definition language) is primarily used to describe |
| *interfaces* to be used on [message pipes](message_pipes.md). Below, we describe |
| practical aspects of the Mojom language. Elsewhere, we describe the [Mojom |
| protocol](mojom_protocol.md). (**TODO(vtl)**: Also, serialization format? |
| Versioning?) |
| |
| Text files written in Mojom IDL are given the `.mojom` extension by convention |
| (and are usually referred to as Mojom/mojom/`.mojom` files). The Mojom bindings |
| generator (**TODO(vtl)**: link?) may be used to generate code in a variety of |
| languages (including C++, Dart, and Go) from a Mojom file. Such generated code |
| "implements" the things specified in the Mojom file, in a way that's appropriate |
| for the particular target language. |
| |
| ## Interfaces |
| |
| A Mojom *interface* is (typically) used to describe communication on a message |
| pipe. Typically, message pipes are created with a particular interface in mind, |
| with one endpoint designated the *client* (which sends *request* messages and |
| receives *response* messages) and the other designed that *server* or *impl* |
| (which receives request messages and sends response messages). |
| |
| For example, take the following Mojom interface declaration: |
| ```mojom |
| interface MyInterface { |
| Foo(int32 a, string b); |
| Bar() => (bool x, uint32 y); |
| Baz() => (); |
| }; |
| ``` |
| This specifies a Mojom interface in which the client may send three types of |
| messages, namely `Foo`, `Bar`, and `Baz` (see the note below about names in |
| Mojom). The first does not have a response message defined, whereas the latter |
| two do. Whenever the server receives a `Bar` or `Baz` message, it *must* |
| (eventually) send a (single) corresponding response message. |
| |
| The `Foo` request message contains two pieces of data: a signed (two's |
| complement) 32-bit integer called `a` and a Unicode string called `b`. On the |
| "wire", the message basically consists of metadata and a (serialized) *struct* |
| (see below) containing `a` and `b`. |
| |
| The `Bar` request message contains no data, so on the wire it's just metadata |
| and an empty struct. It has a response message, containing a boolean value `x` |
| and an unsigned 32-bit integer `y`, which on the wire consists of metadata and a |
| struct with `x` and `y`. Each time the server receives a `Bar` message, it is |
| supposed to (eventually) respond by sending the response message. (Note: The |
| client may include as part of the request message's metadata an identifier for |
| the request; the response's metadata will then include this identifier, allowing |
| it to match responses to requests.) |
| |
| The `Baz` request message also contains no data. It requires a response, also |
| containing no data. Note that even though the response has no data, a response |
| message must nonetheless be sent, functioning as an "ack". (Thus this is |
| different from not having a response, as was the case for `Foo`.) |
| |
| ## Structs |
| |
| Mojom defines a way of serializing data structures (with the Mojom IDL providing |
| a way of specifying those data structures). A Mojom *struct* is the basic unit |
| of serialization. As we saw above, messages are basically just structs, with a |
| small amount of additional metadata. |
| |
| Here is a simple example of a struct declaration: |
| ```mojom |
| struct MyStruct { |
| int32 a; |
| string b; |
| }; |
| ``` |
| We will discuss in greater detail how structs are declared later. |
| |
| ### Names in Mojom |
| |
| Names in Mojom are not important. Except in affecting compatibility at the level |
| of source code (when generating bindings), names in a Mojom file may be changed |
| arbitrarily without any effect on the "meaning" of the Mojom file (subject to |
| basic language requirements, e.g., avoiding collisions with keywords and other |
| names). E.g., the following is completely equivalent to the interface discussed |
| above: |
| ```mojom |
| interface Something { |
| One(int32 an_integer, string a_string); |
| Two() => (bool a_boolean, uint32 an_unsigned); |
| Three() => (); |
| }; |
| ``` |
| The `Something` interface is compatible at a binary level with `MyInterface`. A |
| client using the `Something` interface may communicate with a server |
| implementing the `MyInterface` with no issues, and vice versa. |
| |
| The reason for this is that elements (messages, parameters, struct members, |
| etc.) are actually identified by *ordinal* value. They may be specified |
| explicitly (using `@123` notation; see below). If they are not specified |
| explicitly, they are automatically assigned. (The ordinal values for each |
| interface/struct/etc. must assign distinct values for each item, in a |
| consecutive range starting at 0.) |
| |
| Explicitly assigning ordinals allows Mojom files to be rearranged "physically" |
| without changing their meaning. E.g., perhaps one would write: |
| ```mojom |
| interface MyInterface { |
| Bar@1() => (bool x@0, uint32 y@1); |
| Baz@2() => (); |
| |
| // Please don't use this in new code! |
| FooDeprecated@0(int32 a@0, string b@1); |
| }; |
| ``` |
| |
| Ordinals also tie into the versioning scheme (**TODO(vtl)**: link?), which |
| allows Mojom files to be evolved in a backwards-compatible way. We will not |
| discuss this matter further here. |
| |
| **TODO(vtl)**: Maybe mention exceptions to this in attributes (e.g., |
| `ServiceName`). |
| |
| ## Mojom files |
| |
| A Mojom file consists of, in order: |
| * an optional *module* declaration; |
| * zero or more *import* statements (the order of these is not important); and |
| * zero or more declarations of *struct*s, *interface*s, *union*s, *enum*s, or |
| *const*s (the order of these is not important). |
| (These are all described further below.) |
| |
| Additionally, C/C++-style comments are supported (i.e., single-line comments |
| starting with `//` or multi-line comments of the form `/* ... */`). |
| |
| As stated above, the order of struct/interface/union/enum/const declarations is |
| not important. This is required to allow "cyclic" structures to be defined. |
| Nonetheless, whenever possible, one should declare things before they are |
| "used". For example, the following is valid but not recommended: |
| ```mojom |
| // NOT recommended. |
| |
| const MyEnum kMyConst = kMyOtherConst; |
| const MyEnum kMyOtherConst = A_VALUE; |
| |
| enum MyEnum { |
| A_VALUE, |
| ANOTHER_VALUE, |
| }; |
| ``` |
| |
| ### Naming style |
| |
| There is a standard style for naming things: |
| * `StudlyCaps` (a.k.a. `CapitalizedCamelCase`) for: (struct, interface, union, |
| and enum) type names and message (a.k.a. function or method) names; |
| * `unix_hacker_style` for field names (in structs and unions) and "parameter" |
| names; |
| * `ALL_CAPS_UNIX_HACKER_STYLE` for enum value names; and |
| * `kStudlyCaps` for const names. |
| |
| Following this style is highly recommended, since code generators for various |
| languages will expect this style, in order to transform the names into a more |
| language-appropriate style. |
| |
| ### Module statement |
| |
| The Mojom *module* statement is just a way of logically grouping Mojom |
| declarations. For example: |
| ```mojom |
| module my_module; |
| ``` |
| Mojom modules are similar to C++ namespaces (and the standard C++ code generator |
| would put generated code into the `my_module` namespace), in that there is no |
| implication that the file contains the entirety of the "module" definiton; |
| multiple files may have the same module statement. (There is also no requirement |
| that the module name have anything to do with the file path containing the Mojom |
| file.) |
| |
| Mojom module names are hierarchical in that they can be composed of multiple |
| parts separated by `.`. For example: |
| ```mojom |
| module my_module.my_submodule; |
| |
| struct MyStruct { |
| }; |
| ``` |
| Name look-up is similar to C++: E.g., if the current module is |
| `my_module.my_submodule` then `MyStruct`, `my_submodule.MyStruct`, and |
| `my_module.my_submodule.MyStruct` all refer to the above struct, whereas if the |
| current module is just `my_module` then only the latter two do. |
| |
| ### Import declarations |
| |
| An *import* declaration makes the declarations from another Mojom file available |
| in the current Mojom file. Moreover, it operates transitively, in the sense that |
| it also makes the imports of the imported file available, etc. The "argument" to |
| the import statement is a path to a file. Tools that work with Mojom files are |
| typically provided with a search path for importing files (just as a C++ |
| compiler can be provided with an "include path"), for the purposes of resolving |
| these paths. (**TODO(vtl)**: This always includes the current Mojom file's path, |
| right? Is the current path the first path that's searched?) |
| |
| For example: |
| ```mojom |
| module my_module; |
| |
| import "path/to/another.mojom"; |
| import "path/to/yet/a/different.mojom"; |
| ``` |
| This makes the contents of the two mentioned Mojom files available, together |
| with whatever they import, transitively. (Note that names are resolved in the |
| way described in the previous section.) |
| |
| Import cycles are not permitted (so, e.g., it would be an error if |
| `path/to/another.mojom` imported the current Mojom file). However, it is |
| entirely valid for Mojom files to be imported (transitively) multiple times |
| (e.g., it is fine for `path/to/another.mojom` to also import |
| `path/to/yet/a/different.mojom`). |
| |
| ### Struct declarations |
| |
| A Mojom *struct* declaration consists of a finite sequence of *field |
| declaration*, each of which consists of a *type*, a *name*, and optionally a |
| *default value* (if applicable for the given type). (If no default value is |
| declared, then the default is the default value for the field type, typically 0, |
| null, or similar.) |
| |
| Additionally, a struct may contain enum and const declarations (**TODO(vtl)**: |
| why not struct/union/interface declarations?). While the order of the field |
| declarations (with respect to one another) is important, the ordering of the |
| enum/const declarations (with respect to both the field declarations and other |
| enum/const declarations) is not. (But as before, we recommend declaring things |
| before "use".) |
| |
| Here is an example with these elements: |
| ```mojom |
| struct Foo { |
| const int8 kSomeConstant = 123; |
| |
| enum MyEnum { |
| A_VALUE, |
| ANOTHER_VALUE |
| }; |
| |
| int8 first_field = kSomeConstant; |
| uint32 second_field = 123; |
| MyEnum etc_etc = A_VALUE; |
| float a; // Default value is 0. |
| string? b; // Default value is null. |
| }; |
| ``` |
| (Note that `kSomeConstant` may be referred to as `Foo.kSomeConstant` and, |
| similarly, `MyEnum` as `Foo.MyEnum`. This is required outside of the `Foo` |
| declaration.) |
| |
| ### Interface declarations |
| |
| **TODO(vtl)** |
| |
| ### Union declarations |
| |
| **TODO(vtl)** |
| |
| ### Enum declarations |
| |
| **TODO(vtl)** |
| |
| ### Const declarations |
| |
| **TODO(vtl)** |
| |
| **TODO(vtl)**: Write/(re)organize the sections below. |
| |
| ## Data types |
| |
| ### Primitive types |
| |
| #### Standard types |
| |
| #### Enum types |
| |
| ### "Pointer" types |
| |
| #### Nullability |
| |
| #### Strings |
| |
| #### Maps |
| |
| #### Structs |
| |
| #### Arrays |
| |
| #### Unions |
| |
| ### Handle types |
| |
| #### Raw handle types |
| |
| #### Interface types |
| |
| #### Interface request types |
| |
| ## Annotations |
| |
| ## Pipelining |